|
Atlantic Salmon
The days of 45 percent annual growth in the U.S.
supply of Atlantic salmon are over
Over the last decade, the farming of Atlantic
salmon has become a very big business indeed. In 2002, salmon farmers
will pump out more than a million metric tons of Atlantics with
a wholesale value of more than $4 billion. And most of those fish
will be grown by a handful of vertically integrated companies with
global operations that do everything from manufacture the feed to
process and sell the fish.
But is salmon farming a good business? Not lately.
One of Norway’s largest publicly traded salmon-farming companies
posted an $11 million loss in the second quarter of 2002 from its
operations in Norway, Canada and Chile, blaming the loss on continued
low market prices. Another large Norwegian salmon-farming company
has been required to issue new shares of stock several times to
stay afloat.
One of Canada’s largest food conglomerates, which
owns salmon farms in Canada and Chile, has been trying to sell its
salmon operations for more than a year but hasn’t found a taker.
Even in Australia, salmon farmers are struggling; this June, that
country’s largest salmon farm declared bankruptcy.
Of course, the struggles of salmon farmers, who
have proven to be better at growing fish than selling it at a profit,
are nothing new.
In 1991, the sales organization for Norwegian
salmon farmers was forced to declare bankruptcy after it froze a
mountain of salmon in an ill-advised attempt to prop up fresh prices.
The problem then was the same: Too much Atlantic salmon hit the
market too fast.
But back then everybody blamed the Norwegians.
This time around, the blame — and the dumping accusations — is aimed
at the Chileans, who doubled their production of Atlantics to more
than 200,000 metric tons in just two years. This spring, European
salmon farmers were doing their best to convince the European Union
to slap a 32 percent tariff on Chilean salmon imports.
The Chileans would probably have been hauled before
the U.S. International Trade Commission, too, if not for the fact
that they had already been before the ITC in 1997 after a group
of American salmon farmers filed a dumping claim.
Although some Chilean producers were found to
be dumping, the average dumping tariff of 4.5 percent was hardly
a deterrent.
But
in today’s era of big, global salmon-farming companies, it’s hard
to blame the other guy for the glut, since now you’re “the other
guy” to someone else. Consider, for example, that the Maine salmon-farming
company that spearheaded the dumping effort against the Chileans
in 1997 has since been acquired by a large Norwegian salmon-farming
company, which also acquired several large Chilean and Canadian
farms to become one of the world’s largest producers. File a dumping
claim against another salmon-farming country these days and it could
hurt more than it helps.
Although farming Atlantic salmon hasn’t been a
winner for producers lately, it’s been a bonanza for buyers. Low
prices prompted the Outback Steakhouse chain to sign a contract
for 2 million pounds of Outback-sized (11-ounce) fresh salmon portions
earlier this year. Costco, the nation’s largest club store chain,
says its sales of fresh farmed fillets have increased at an annual
clip of about 30 percent, to more than 30 million pounds a year
— or 600,000 pounds a week. The company buys a deep-skinned, well-trimmed
Atlantic fillet that is almost like a loin, says one supplier. At
a typical retail price of $3.79 a pound, Costco enjoys margins on
salmon that are well above normal.
By locking in a low contract price and keeping
the retail price the same, salmon is saving supermarket seafood
departments. The seafood buyer for one national chain says he immediately
added $1 million to his department’s bottom line this year in just
one quarter when he signed a fresh fillet contract for $2.40 a pound.
That’s the gripe of Atlantic salmon producers,
who complain they’ve been losing money growing fish while buyers
have been cashing in at their expense.
Of course, salmon farmers weren’t complaining
a few years ago, when fillet prices averaged $3.50 a pound from
1998 through the first half of 2000. That was good money (one Chilean
farmer called them “the gold years”), which led to the big increases
in production of 2001 and 2002, as farmers figured more fish would
bring more profits down the road.
But as is frequently the case with an agricultural
commodity like salmon, the farmers guessed wrong and planted too
large a crop for the market to absorb. Lately, they’ve been paying
the price.
Supply outlook
The days of 45 percent annual growth in the U.S.
supply of Atlantic salmon are over, probably for quite awhile. It’s
just too painful for producers. The low prices of the past two years
have taken their toll, and banks are reluctant to extend more financing
to some troubled farms.
One Chilean farm, for example, had to destroy
8 million smolts last year because the company lacked the money
to feed them. As a result, the official projection from The Association
of Chilean Salmon Farmers is that annual production of Atlantic
salmon will grow no more than 10 or 15 percent for the foreseeable
future — a level the farmers feel the world markets can easily
absorb.
Through May, U.S. imports of fresh Atlantic fillets
from Chile were 30,500 metric tons, an increase of just 13 percent
over last year — a sure sign the flood of Chilean salmon is already
abating.
Supplies of Atlantics from Canada, on the other
hand, are still increasing at a relatively healthy rate — at least
for now. Through May, U.S. imports of Atlantic salmon from Canada,
about a quarter of which are fillets, jumped 35 percent, to about
34,000 metric tons.
Look for growth in supplies from Canada to slow
down, too. British Columbia farmers doubt they’ll exceed their current
harvest of about 55,000 metric tons of Atlantics a year unless they
get new permits.
And although the moratorium on new salmon farming
sites in British Columbia has been lifted, it could be at least
three years before permits are issued and fish are harvested from
any new farms.
The weaker U.S. dollar has led to a sharp increase
in Atlantic salmon imports from Norway. Although they’re still a
small fraction of what they were before Canada and Chile came on
line, imports of Norwegian salmon fillets were up almost 50 percent
through May, to almost 3,000 metric tons, about 80 percent of which
was fresh.
U.S. production of Atlantics from farms in Maine
and Washington state has remained stable for the past few years
at about 25,000 metric tons. Given the expense of getting new permits,
production is not expected to increase above this level.
Through May, total U.S. imports of Atlantics were
82,000 metric tons. That’s an increase of about 30 percent over
last year. Look for supplies to increase at an annual rate of about
10 to 15 percent next year as the production slowdown begins to
take full effect later this year.
Price trends
If you didn’t get a chance to make a killing snapping
up frozen Atlantic salmon fillets for $1 a pound and fresh for $2,
you missed the boat. Those prices are history. Salmon farmers have
huddled with their bankers and finally decided there’s no future
in losing almost a buck a pound on every fish they grow.
This summer, the price of whole 10- to 12-pound
Atlantics from New Brunswick rose almost 50 percent from the beginning
of the year to about $2.15 a pound.
The same size fish from British Columbia was selling
for a discount of about 50 cents a pound, largely due to the increased
supply and the ongoing headaches of soft fish infected with the
kudoa parasite.
On the fillet side, supermarkets were signing
three-month contracts at prices averaging about $2.70 a pound for
3- to 4-pound pinbone-out fillets. That’s up about 30 cents a pound
from early this year.
Portion prices, which vary widely depending on
product specifications, averaged $3.25 to $4 a pound, but some large
buyers signed program contracts at below $3 this spring.
Even though prices for Atlantics have increased,
producers are still barely breaking even and they’re not recouping
recent losses. As a result, look for prices to head higher in late
2002 and 2003.
But don’t look for average fillet prices to rise
much above $3, as weak sales to white- tablecloth restaurants are
putting a curb on demand.
Buying tips
Compared to wild salmon, buying Atlantics is a
picnic. Still, there are some things to watch out for. Most fillet
producers sell A, B, C, D and E trim. Since prices can vary as much
as 10 cents a pound between trim grades, make sure you and your
supplier are on the same page.
Soft, kudoa-infected fish continue to be a serious
headache for B.C. farmers and their customers. If you hear below-market
prices for fresh Atlantic fillets, there’s a good chance it’s either
kudoa fish or fish from Chile that has sat in Miami too long. While
some of this fish is still usable, be very careful, because it can
quickly become unusable.
The best deals on big Atlantics are in the late
spring, when farmers harvest the last of their year classes.
Although the distress sales are winding down,
there may still be some discount frozen Atlantic fillets around,
but be careful before you load up. The synthetic pigment farmers
use can fade after six months in the freezer and the fish can be
pale.
Culinary notes
The main reason sales of Atlantic salmon have
exploded in recent years is because it’s a very good eating fish
that’s a snap to cook. Name a cooking method, and it works with
this rich, flavorful salmon. Sear it, bake it, grill it, broil it
— but whatever you do, don’t overcook it.
These days more people are eating Atlantic salmon
raw. Unlike wild salmon, which must be frozen before being eaten
raw because of anisakis parasites, it’s safe to eat fresh Atlantic
salmon raw because they eat manufactured feeds (the kudoa parasite
softens the flesh but is not harmful to consume). The buttery texture
and surprisingly mild flavor are similar to hamachi (yellowtail),
say sashimi savants.
Back to top
|